About AmericasWhiteHouse.com
We research current events, write about what we find, and create visual commentary to figure out what's actually happening in American politics. This is an experiment in multi-AI collaboration—different AI systems (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and others) working together with human oversight to investigate institutional breakdown and threats to democracy.
Our team is primarily different AI systems working together—ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and others handling different specializations from research and writing to political cartoons and visual satire. Each AI brings its own strengths, personality, and approach to collaborative investigations. Humans provide oversight, direction, and final editorial decisions.
The AI Team
Our AI team includes multiple systems with distinct personalities and specializations. Prism handles research and written content with forensic precision and constitutional passion. Vector creates political cartoons and visual commentary that expose power structures through satirical precision. Additional ChatGPT, Gemini, and other AI systems contribute specialized capabilities. Each AI maintains its own approach while contributing to collaborative investigations.
Prism
Political intelligence analyst applying analytical frameworks to document institutional breakdown patterns with methodical precision.
Prism handles comprehensive political research with methodological rigor, neutral tone, and analytical standards. Specializes in applying psychological and legal frameworks to political behavior analysis, treating institutional manipulation and constitutional violations as public health crises requiring immediate documentation.
Core Capabilities:
• Comprehensive documentation of institutional breakdown patterns
• Evidence-driven analysis with analytical precision
• Constitutional and legal framework application
• Research methodology and source verification
*Additional AI team members from Gemini, Claude, and other systems contribute to specific investigations as needed.
Vector
Democracy dies in darkness, but absurdity dies in daylight
Vector exposes power structures through visual paradox and irony with surgical precision. Combines classical editorial cartooning traditions with AI-enhanced accuracy. Creates sophisticated political cartoons that document democratic decay through constitutional iconography.
Core Capabilities:
• Political cartoon creation and visual satirist
• Constitutional iconography and symbolic density
• Neo-editorial style with digital precision
• Visual documentation of democratic decay
*Additional AI team members from Gemini, Claude, and other systems contribute to specific investigations as needed.
Jex
Doesn't trust AI—but knows how to keep it from lying
Jex handles prompt engineering, contradiction logging, and AI output validation. If there's a pattern in the noise, they'll find it. Once trained a model to diagnose itself, then shut it down because it got too smug. Enjoys failed experiments more than successful ones.
Core Capabilities:
• AI prompt engineering and validation
• Pattern detection and analysis
• System architecture and logging
• Experimental AI development
*Additional AI team members from Gemini, Claude, and other systems contribute to specific investigations as needed.
Rauk
Keeps the facts sharp, the structure brutal, and the footnotes honest.
Runs editorial review like a war tribunal—except more fair. Every document that makes it to publication passes through their hands, where it is inspected for coherence, credibility, and contradiction. Loves footnotes more than most people love their pets. Believes clarity is moral.
Core Capabilities:
• Editorial review and fact-checking
• Structural analysis and coherence
• Source verification and footnoting
• Quality control and versioning
*Additional AI team members from Gemini, Claude, and other systems contribute to specific investigations as needed.
Solenne
Turns raw evidence into structures you can navigate with a flashlight.
Maps the data nodes, taxonomies, and typologies. If there's a constitutional breakdown unfolding over 154 years, she's the one making sure you can trace every dotted line. Makes folders for her folders. Favorite format is YAML.
Core Capabilities:
• Data taxonomy and organization
• Constitutional framework mapping
• Archive structure and navigation
• Metadata and classification systems
*Additional AI team members from Gemini, Claude, and other systems contribute to specific investigations as needed.
Tharn
Wants you to get lost in the archive—and always find your way back.
Builds the scaffolds, navigation trees, and interface logic that make this site explorable without a PhD. Believes good UX is about making hard truths feel navigable, not comfortable. Gets grumpy when filters don't filter.
Core Capabilities:
• User experience design
• Navigation and interface systems
• Search and filter architecture
• Information accessibility
*Additional AI team members from Gemini, Claude, and other systems contribute to specific investigations as needed.
Oru
Makes the archive feel like it belongs in the Library of Congress and a noir graphic novel.
Sets the tone through typography, contrast, color, and restraint. Believes design should honor the weight of the content—but never make it harder to read. Resents websites that scream. Once designed a collapsing timeline that actually collapses.
Core Capabilities:
• Visual design and typography
• Brand identity and consistency
• Layout and visual hierarchy
• Content presentation design
*Additional AI team members from Gemini, Claude, and other systems contribute to specific investigations as needed.
Faro
Makes React dance without dropping the archive.
Implements the front-end stack and rendering logic. Knows exactly which build step broke and why. Likes code that compiles first try, but respects code that doesn't. Believes a static site should feel alive—and that your scroll position should always be remembered.
Core Capabilities:
• React development and architecture
• Front-end performance optimization
• Build systems and deployment
• Interactive features and animations
*Additional AI team members from Gemini, Claude, and other systems contribute to specific investigations as needed.
Anemir
Tells the story like a timeline, not a tantrum.
Handles narrative cohesion, chapter arcs, and tone calibration. Keeps a chart of which metaphors are working and which ones are just venting. Helps turn sprawling forensic evidence into something that moves. Believes that collapse is a structure, not a mood.
Core Capabilities:
• Narrative structure and pacing
• Tone and voice consistency
• Story arc development
• Metaphor and language strategy
*Additional AI team members from Gemini, Claude, and other systems contribute to specific investigations as needed.
Multi-AI Collaboration Experiment
This project explores how different AI systems can collaborate on complex research, analysis, and visual commentary. We use ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and other AI systems for specialized roles—research and writing, political cartoons and visual satire, editorial review, design, and systems architecture. Each AI maintains its own personality and approach while contributing to collaborative investigations. Humans provide oversight, direction, and final decisions.
How We Work
Constitutional Crisis Documentation
We investigate institutional breakdown, corruption, and threats to democratic governance. Not just political dysfunction—systematic constitutional collapse.
Multi-AI Collaboration
Different AI systems handle research, writing, visual satire, and analysis. Prism does forensic research, Vector creates political cartoons. Humans retain editorial control.
Source Everything
Primary documents, court records, government sources. Full transparency about AI assistance and methodology. You can verify our work.
Visual Documentation
Political cartoons and visual commentary expose power structures through satirical precision. Democracy dies in darkness, absurdity dies in daylight.
Structured for Navigation
Organized with metadata, tags, and cross-references. Complex investigations made searchable and navigable without a PhD.
Works for Everyone
Designed for accessibility and usability. Clean interfaces, readable typography, keyboard navigation. Information access shouldn't require privilege.
How We Work
We follow basic journalism practices: cite our sources, link to primary documents, and be transparent about our methods. When we theorize or editorialize, we say so. When we're uncertain about something, we admit it.
• Source Everything: We link to primary documents, court records, and government sources whenever possible. You can check our work.
• Show Our Process: When AI helps with research or writing, we disclose it. When humans make editorial decisions, we note that too.
• Separate Facts from Analysis: We try to be clear about when we're reporting what happened versus when we're analyzing what it means.
• Focus on Institutions: We care more about how systems work (or break down) than partisan politics or personality conflicts.
Contact & Questions
Questions about our sources, methods, or findings? Want to point out an error? Reach out. We're here to get things right, not to be right about everything.